<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pliantalliance.org/2008/11/19/wow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pliantalliance.org/2008/11/19/wow/</link>
	<description>Think. Evaluate. Change.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ravi Mohan</title>
		<link>http://pliantalliance.org/2008/11/19/wow/comment-page-1/#comment-1242</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravi Mohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pliantalliance.org/?p=89#comment-1242</guid>
		<description>I liked Luke&#039;s article  too :-) 

The Agile Thought Police soon descended on him. The arguments haven&#039;t changed. they just sound more defensive and shrill :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked Luke&#8217;s article  too :-) </p>
<p>The Agile Thought Police soon descended on him. The arguments haven&#8217;t changed. they just sound more defensive and shrill :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tbeck</title>
		<link>http://pliantalliance.org/2008/11/19/wow/comment-page-1/#comment-1054</link>
		<dc:creator>tbeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pliantalliance.org/?p=89#comment-1054</guid>
		<description>Yeah, no doubt, &quot;Agile&quot; is a much better word.  I&#039;d much rather use it except for the baggage that comes along with it.  I think I talk about that somewhere on the site.  Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, no doubt, &#8220;Agile&#8221; is a much better word.  I&#8217;d much rather use it except for the baggage that comes along with it.  I think I talk about that somewhere on the site.  Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Halliwell</title>
		<link>http://pliantalliance.org/2008/11/19/wow/comment-page-1/#comment-1053</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Halliwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 06:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pliantalliance.org/?p=89#comment-1053</guid>
		<description>Really glad you liked it so much :)

I&#039;m sure you&#039;re aware already, but I highly recommend Steve Yegge&#039;s &quot;Good Agile, Bad Agile&quot; piece that I linked to near the end.  Where my post is on the angry side, his is very much witty.

Haven&#039;t had time to read all of this site (but I will), although your &#039;about&#039; page makes a lot of sense.  It pretty much captures the way I like to think about software development; I might try and put that down in words in an upcoming post.

I fear that the term &#039;pliant&#039; may be significantly less catchy than &#039;Agile&#039;, but I hope the ideas can catch on nevertheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really glad you liked it so much :)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re aware already, but I highly recommend Steve Yegge&#8217;s &#8220;Good Agile, Bad Agile&#8221; piece that I linked to near the end.  Where my post is on the angry side, his is very much witty.</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t had time to read all of this site (but I will), although your &#8216;about&#8217; page makes a lot of sense.  It pretty much captures the way I like to think about software development; I might try and put that down in words in an upcoming post.</p>
<p>I fear that the term &#8216;pliant&#8217; may be significantly less catchy than &#8216;Agile&#8217;, but I hope the ideas can catch on nevertheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
