<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Agile&#8221; is Just A Brand Name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pliantalliance.org/2006/06/19/agile-is-just-a-brand-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pliantalliance.org/2006/06/19/agile-is-just-a-brand-name/</link>
	<description>Think. Evaluate. Change.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tbeck</title>
		<link>http://pliantalliance.org/2006/06/19/agile-is-just-a-brand-name/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>tbeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 20:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pliantalliance.org/?p=25#comment-50</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/51&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;James&lt;/a&gt; disputes Brian&#039;s claim that &quot;Agile&quot; is a marketing term.  I can see this becoming a long drawn out argument.  Frankly I don&#039;t really care about the origins of &quot;Agile&quot;.  All I care about is what it means &lt;b&gt;now&lt;/b&gt;.  In my opinion, &quot;Agile&quot; has definately become a marketing term.  So,  like I said in the original post, I&#039;m moving on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.satisfice.com/blog/archives/51" rel="nofollow">James</a> disputes Brian&#8217;s claim that &#8220;Agile&#8221; is a marketing term.  I can see this becoming a long drawn out argument.  Frankly I don&#8217;t really care about the origins of &#8220;Agile&#8221;.  All I care about is what it means <b>now</b>.  In my opinion, &#8220;Agile&#8221; has definately become a marketing term.  So,  like I said in the original post, I&#8217;m moving on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pliantalliance.org &#187; Pliancy is Another Word for Evolvibility</title>
		<link>http://pliantalliance.org/2006/06/19/agile-is-just-a-brand-name/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>pliantalliance.org &#187; Pliancy is Another Word for Evolvibility</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pliantalliance.org/?p=25#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] Dan North has a post about how agility is about coming up with a &#8220;repeatable, predictable way to adapt to change&#8221;. First of all, as we&#8217;ve discovered, &#8220;Agility&#8221; is about marketing, so in a sense, Dan is wrong. However, getting better at software development is about evolvibilty. Adapting to a changing context and working in a way that best suits ythat context is the path to better software development. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dan North has a post about how agility is about coming up with a &#8220;repeatable, predictable way to adapt to change&#8221;. First of all, as we&#8217;ve discovered, &#8220;Agility&#8221; is about marketing, so in a sense, Dan is wrong. However, getting better at software development is about evolvibilty. Adapting to a changing context and working in a way that best suits ythat context is the path to better software development. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

